- Stories
- New stories Traditionally Anal Drama Group Cheating stories Non-consent Defloration Observers Office Romance Occasion Students Swingers Romantic Fetish Fantasies Queer Humiliation Execution Golden shower Blowjob Humor Poetry Erotic fairy tales Elderly Sex Tourism Seduction Science Fiction Non-erotic Femdom Cunnilingus Cuckold Other
Comment on publication: Fallout 4. Unprinted
There will be new, do not hesitate. Not right now, but somewhere in May - for sure.
Comment on publication: Dragon Age II. Red on black
What could - helped. :)
Comment on publication: Dragon Age. Roads that await us
Right, thanks. He doubted whether to publish it here at all - too distracting from the site’s style - but if someone liked it, then I decided to post it for good reason.
Comment on publication: Dragon Age II. Red on black
And “fairldan” instead of “Ferelden”? :)
"Riveinka" really looks cumbersome, but "Riveini" in Russian does not sound like an ethnonym at all.
Comment on publication: Dragon Age: Origins. History lessons
It is curious that you gave the heroine a bright future for the heroine, even though I wrote the story in the most optimistic manner possible. It is curious because it still has a chance to survive and to slurp its military campaigns with a strainer throughout the game, but the gentleman and parents will not live to see the sun rising: the plot, s.
Apparently, the coming tragedy broke through the clownish narrative style. :)
Comment on publication: Dragon Age II. Tempering swords
"Erotic"? Mercy, pornography as it is. :-)
Comment on publication: Dragon Age II. Tempering swords
Thank you. Since I do not compose plots, but only freely interpret the lines of love inherent in the literary form, the range of possible plots, including their further development, is not determined by my imagination. Therefore, the continuation of the cycle, united by the series of the same name - for sure; the continuation of this particular plot is definitely not.
Comment on publication: Dragon Age: Origins. Horns and hooves
That's right!
Comment on publication: Sex as a vocation. Part 4
I noted this - that you, as follows from your own words, read in Tolstoy much more than stories, and therefore it is strange that you are guided precisely by them in the evaluations.
"Sadism" is also a controversial issue. Tolstoy lived in a different historical space with different value settings. Take, for example, “Devgeniyevoe Deed” - for a twenty-first century man the main character is a sadist, prone to outbursts of uncontrollable violence. And for a man of the age of the thirteenth century - the merciful and Christ-loving warrior The gap in consciousness with the era of Tolstoy, too, is, albeit smaller.
Tolstoy was mistaken in the belief that the people are not interested in the classics, and he needs special literature, which he, well or badly, tried to create in the form of fairy tales. And, as Sytin’s publishing experience shows, the classics were very interesting to the people. But this is a completely different reconstruction ...
Comment on publication: Sex as a vocation. Part 4
1. It is rather strange to attribute a person to a person. categories, whether “philosopher” or “writer,” on the basis of one, very small slice of his work. I am familiar (like you) with a part of Lev Nikolayevich’s heritage, much more than his fairy tales, but I would not dare to draw such conclusions on this material.
2. “The Writer” (for me) is the author who creates literary works of art, and the “philosopher” is a person who creates some ideological concept. From Tolstoy, neither the one nor the other should be taken away.
3. Yes, moralizing is perhaps an integral part of Tolstoy's style. I am not sympathetic to a number of his moral attitudes, but this is a question of the relationship between my beliefs and his / smb.and his, and not the mental abilities of the graph or the cultural significance of his work.
4. Yes, in “VIM” he (ALNOUTLY with a storyline and a demonstration of characters) tries to promote his philosophical concept. The concept does not stand up to historical criticism, but practically any philosopher of history suffers from this. But as a writer Tolstoy creates a number of attractive characters - Tushin, Denisov, Dorokhov; shows the evolution of a mama son in a worthy soldier and strong master. This is someone that is interesting. :-)
5. And yes, Tolstoy, as ANY classic, you can read and think; Dostoevsky is not monopolized. For example, as in my case, think about how best to refute it.
6. I did not read de Sade. Regardless of him, I am a moralist, not an erophobe.