For some reason, the researchers of the history of Marxism do not dwell on the issues of sex in proletarian studies, although in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, an entire chapter is devoted to the arguments: “How shall we divide women?”

Having noticed such a feature of girls as the love of luxury and wealth, the founders of a glass of Bavarian beer came to the sober conclusion that by depriving bourgeois private property, they thereby deprive them of the necessary properties that women prefer to sleep with the rich at the expense of the poor.

A highly remarkable idea was put forward that women should be divided not by the amount of available capital, but by fairness, or at least equally.

You have to be a fool to avoid the ideas of Marxism, when it comes to women.

It becomes obvious that all social upheavals, especially revolutions, are based on sexual dissatisfaction. Well, tell me, does a person who regularly live sexually go to the barricades to shoot people who also live sexually regularly? It is doubtful.

And now it is clear why Lenin became the leader of the world proletariat. I would hang with such a terrible wife!

Justice of words is proved by the slogans of the revolutionary-minded masses, calling, first of all, to socialize the land, in the second - the factories, and in the third - the women.

As a rule, socialization ended at the level of leaders. However, even ordinary party fighters sought to keep up with the expropriation of women left after the fleeing bourgeoisie and noblemen - for what then did they take Winter?

And yet, the Bolsheviks summed up the lack of development of sex issues. The theoretical base was rather weak. Although it was they who put forward the most erotic idea in the whole history of mankind: “Proletarians of all countries, unite!” In addition, the Bolsheviks declared revolution as a midwife, obviously hinting that revolutionaries are its sex giants.

But, having tried to apply the class approach to the female breast and other charms, it suddenly turned out that the noble woman’s breast caused exactly the same sexual reaction as the peasant woman’s breast, even if it was broken.

Then the Bolsheviks decided not to apply the class approach here, they declared sin to be the family cell of society, and began to consider sex as a socially useful and necessary thing for the country. And if something goes wrong in your bed, the party cell will gather and help you together, and the party committee, if anything, supports, strengthens and directs.

The party boldly assumed the role of the avant-garde, so that no one doubted who was ahead of them.

They even collected a special night meeting of the Central Committee, where a single position in bed was developed and approved for all grass-roots party organizations: a man from above, a woman from below. And on the contrary - was regarded as a betrayal of the communist ideals.

And until now, the Communists can not make a deal with conscience in matters of gender. “We will not give up our positions. We will not give up holy principles. “Man is on top, woman is on bottom” - this is holy! Don't touch it! ”

It goes without saying that the youth also tried to keep up with their older comrades, who used the bed exclusively for debates with the wife about collectivization, industrialization, the right to deviate and only in extreme cases to sleep. If a young Bolshevik offered a girl in a red scarf to start a family tonight, she answered with a fire in her eyes: “It’s not time yet, comrade! The fire of the world revolution is still not over. Here we build communism, then we will deal closely with the sexual issue. "

Vivid examples of attitudes towards sex are given by Soviet cinema. The scene of flirting between a young girl and a young military is usually built like this.She asks, hinting to him that it is time to move on to more active actions: “What do you think, honey, looking at this pair of cute butterflies playing on the hill?” “I think, my love,” the military says gloomily, to put a machine gun - the area hurts itself well into the fire "

Personally, I always stood in politics and sex for democratic principles.

Recently, I read in one dictionary on sexology that pluralism, it turns out, has a second meaning, namely: pluralism is a kind of exhibitionism in combination with voyeurism, when three or more sexual partners participate in sexual intimacy.

Obviously, the concept of socialism should also have its sexual counterpart. Looking at our history it is not difficult to define it.

First, this is an undoubted homosexual bias, expressed in the sincere love of every honest party member to the father of nations. Then, a large share of necrophilia, from no less passionate love of all, from young to old, to a dead person lying in the center of the country. And, of course, gerontophilia from touching love to the governing elders, who kissed so passionately at every meeting and farewell. Interestingly, Leonid Ilyich’s jaw was false, did anyone ever suck it at least once?

The current state of the country from a sexual point of view can be defined as the state of complete impotence and the last stage of wear and tear.

There is a hope that sooner or later we will finally get rid of the communist sexual perversion and come to a normal democratic sexual freedom. When love between people will be a voluntary, and most importantly, enjoyable thing. When anyone, with anyone, anytime, anywhere, any number, and how much. Then you can relax, sincerely say: "I love you all!" - and after that get complete satisfaction.