The logical continuation of the article on the types of graphomania.
As is known, CT, rather specific lit. Site. Some readers come here to ejaculate, orgasm, while reading the graphomania’s opuses. Another category is to get two in one: Satisfy your base passions, and get moral and aesthetic satisfaction. There are still others - koi are looking for diamonds here, in the midst of garbage and husk.
Critics are different: shitty and godlike. I combined them into types. Many authors who are in the same bottle: and critics (reviewers) will find themselves in these types. Will find themselves and readers.
1 Kiseynik Kukushinsky - CreteG, who reads only what is pleasant to his darling. His grades do not fall below 9. In his reviews, he widely praises, explaining in the infinite love of the author, not paying attention to the gender of the latter, social status and religion. His words, Kiseynik, are filled with molasses and oil, the honey letters are woven into strawberry words, and the sentences are full of kisses and a fanatical devotion to the creative of the graphomaniac and the author himself.
2 Goblin Zasrachensky - the exact opposite of Kukushinnik. They are a polar couple - polar explorers, karoch. Goblin is looking for only disgusting stories like KGAM (Creative - shit, author - asshole) And he finds! Perhaps the creative and not shit, but the author is not an asshole at all, but you can get to the telegraph pole: “Why did you dig in? Wires entangled? Have you gotten in touch with everyone? ” If the troller was pleased with the story - there is nothing to complain about, he will quietly go into its expanses of husks and chaff. They are similar in one - these polar explorers. If one misses and does not appreciate the frankly bad stories, the other naibarot - good and liked him.
3 Jumping Dragonfly are those who write briefly and succinctly: “Great, great, write escho, avtar let the product out ...”, admiring or rudely, angry: “tell shit, write in a madhouse, author get well, etc. ". I do not unite them, but they are also similar - these polar explorers. If from the first graphomaniac, he receives at least a pleasure goal, then from the second a goal of confusion. After all, neither the first nor the second, did not explain what they liked and what did not.
4. Fanatic Cybercrocher. The pretentious chitak that comes to the site is sure that all authors strive with their creatives to bring it to orgasm and ejaculation. How do the authors know what excites Cyberdrocher? If he likes to read about incest, and the first couple of stories about pure, first, romantic love? Or the story is tattered, as homosexuality, but the description of this very gom is only two half-pages, and sexualism is even less. He did not finish - the story quickly ended. Kiberdrocher in anger, explains to the author that he did not finish, but I would like to. The author is to blame! Naknopal bad story.
5. Kololishshcher Militant. He does not write good or bad reviews. He day and night watching the emergence of new stories and zaininikivaet them with terrible force, if they exceeded the edge of the seven. Why is he doing this? I do not believe that it is the Author who, seeks to break into people in such a way, by lowering the rating of competitors. Most likely these are fans of his work. But these mediocrity not only do not know how to create themselves, but they do not even know the simple calculation of estimates on the CT. A story with three dozen will not occupy the first place - his place is closer to the last. Because, that it is necessary, still these estimations, let not ten to collect about one thousand. I despise them. Not only for a bitch, mean, quiet little soul, but for dullness))))
6. Literacy Pustobrekhovsky. This notorious person, the story does not read, he is looking for errors in it, both grammatical and punctuation.In his review, he writes: The story does not intend to read - the author, you, a deuce for literacy and puts a number, differentiating a 10-point system into a school 5-point system, although this is mathematically incorrect. Unfortunately, even I, an inveterate twin in Rusich, but an excellent student in literature, sometimes stand on the slippery path of gramostiostnosti. And the jury of the jury of the author. However, I admire his verbiage and admire, how can he create simple sentences with simple words?
7. Sticky sticking. The author and or reader, a fan of one creative. He stuck to him like a bathing sheet to the priests, more precisely to his stories and reads only them, and comments too. It is good if he meds them. And if it mixes with shit? Notorious rarity, but still, sometimes found.
8. Umnychivus - maniachivus. Too vumny, like a vutka, just chop up not wes. He writes in kamente (reviews), all kinds of stuff, which has nothing to do with the story. Turning out this way, showing that he was a dollar bill and everyone should be in love with the streams of his heresy. In addition to bewilderment, no one experiences the usual feelings for his clowns.
9. The normal reviewer, commentator and reader. I know a few of these here, but I will not call them in vain, anyhow they didn’t get proud. And the button is not going to. And so it is clear. They are good!)))
Of course, I grotesquely enough wrote all the images. But if you saw 100,500 yourself in one of them, then you are))))
P. S. With the absence of the presence of Chyu, read this, my brilliant work, strongly recommend)))))))))
P. P. S Enormous request not to be quiet. Estimates don't interest me at all. Write what you think about my article as bad or good. Additions and comments are also welcome.
Wow, so awesome)))
But - I can not comment)))) I will spoil the karma, you panim)))))
So - thanks, laughed))))))))
Reply
I wanted to make you laugh! My dear! It is with so many brackets not less))))
Kissing you right in karma - that’s definitely not spoiling her))))
Reply
Hey hey man, be careful! Karma in my other place is growing))))))))))
Reply
Everyone in the head, and where are you? I'm afraid to even imagine)))))
Reply
Did you kiss my head? O_O Right inside? O_O
Reply
Right in the smiling cloud! Virtually everything is possible!)))))
Reply
MozK does not just smile, but laughs! He's afraid of tickling me))))))))))
Reply
For a satirist, a humorist in my face - this is important! I will not laugh, so I'll tickle)))))
Reply
))))))))
Reply
In vain, my good, you are not interested in evaluation! You write keenly, a real satire. Therefore worthy of the full dozens. She laughed and pondered. And under each type that you derived, I picked up commentators) Everyone inherited under my texts. For myself, too, found a definition)
Delight us more often with your peppered humor! I adore little)
Reply
Thank you my dear and doubly for the help of some types. With adoration and respect. Catch a sweet kiss through space and time)))
Reply
Rembrandt put the brush aside and thought about the transitions between shadow and light:
- Are there creeps from category to category?)))))))
Laughter turned out, the character, too)
Reply
Of course it happens with borders and without borders!))))
Reply
Moreover, Ro_li, it happens that one critic can act in different guises.It depends on many things: mood, attitude to the author (alas, nobody canceled the personal aspect), attitude to the topic and much more.
Reply
Yes! My Queen. There are several authors here, reading the works of which I tremble with excitement, reading the text in anticipation of lust, for it is highly artistic.
There is another kind of authors, from whose stories I come into sexual arousal, even if they are written on a topic that is alien to me or unacceptable.
About the mood. I prefer to read in the silence of the night, when no one distracts especially with phone calls. Just like making love)))
And what about the relationship to the authors. I love them all regardless of sexual affiliation ... women a little more: you can kiss and hug them ... even if virtually)))))
Reply
Listened to the lecture, that is, read it. But, as the great, dry theory says, my friend, and the tree of life is green. Therefore, I propose to hold a practical lesson on the use of classifications (author and reader) according to the tables of the well-known Darwinist classifier Yuri. As for clarity, and to consolidate the material. As an exhibit, I suggest Evgeniya3 - a straight erect homo-sapiens. If it falls into several categories, the virtual dissection of the exhibit is allowed for placing on different shelves.
Reply
No Eugene, I first dismembered myself: fall under three or more categories. Person! - dismembering yourself!))))
Reply
Wrong spelling: “No, I will not dismember Evheni”, missing words ((
Reply
Eugene!
You are very much in a good position. Nine. Personally from myself - if under my story there is no your comment, I start to worry, I start to think that my business is completely dead.
Reply
Thank you, I found myself. And I think it will be interesting, but I’ll finish it, make my debut, and then pagavarim))))) Thank you for the article, thank you.
Reply
Thank you, Oliun! I hope not in one incarnation? I see myself, at least in three)))))
Reply
First, third, sometimes fifth ... And, of course, I am going to become the 9th, like this. As you can see, I'm not far from you)))))
Reply
Read. As requested - the assessment is not set.
Interesting conclusions, inclined to believe them. I can not rate myself on this nine-point scale, because this is not for me to judge. But your irony is understandable, because, reading the comments, she often wondered how strange the evaluations were, not so much the story, as the presence of spelling errors in it, the presence (absence) of sex scenes or the direct reluctance to delve into the essence, debasing everyone and everyone, who does not share their point of view. Nevertheless, there are not so few clean and open readers who can appreciate a good story.
But this is my personal perception. People are different and their opinion should be respected.
Regards, Ptah ..
Reply
I specifically focused on self-criticism. So that everyone appreciates himself, comparing with my definitions, with a huge bit of humor, of course))))
Of course, people are different and everyone has different views and gets up and warming down from everyone from different stories. In addition, they are divided into two main categories: women and men.))))
Straightforwardness and clarity in definitions and descriptions are important to men. Women have a romantic foreplay, beautiful descriptiveness in the interlude, and in the end: everyone was happy and died on the same day))))
Therefore, they criticize, write reviews, looking at each of their own belltower, relying on their own morality, gender identity (predisposition) and sexual preferences.
But I do not intend to respect all opinions. Your respect with pleasure! Dear and adored by me, Ptah!
Catch a virtual kiss for the opinion!))
Reply
Caught - stuck to the right place ...
Reply
I hope to sugar gupkam? Or to the scarlet scratches?)))))
Reply
Each has its own "right" place.
Reply
Somehow I missed your interesting article, thanks Nefertiti, prompted. Pleased, mocked. I picked up my commentators for some categories.
Of course, I am a representative of Kiseynik Kukushinsky, sometimes passing, I dare to hope, to be a normal commentator and reader.
I marvel at your brains Jura, you all like to systematize, divide into categories and types. Umnichka.
Reply
Thank! My Marinochka for clever!)))
I'm a computer programmer. It is necessary, in duty of duty, to systematize everything, to classify: processes, motherboards. video cards, hard drives ...)))
By the way, the words are derived from: “Kiseynaya young lady” and Krylov's fables: “The cuckoo praises the Rooster, because he praises the cuckoo”))))
Of course, all this is very grotesque. But I, rather, also come under the 1st category
I like not to criticize, but to sing the praises)))
Reply
Ostrogrammed Yura choleretic and let's all ... organize! But it turned out cheerfully, it pleases)). I comment on the principle of "hooked" and "I want to talk with the author," with the estimates - as lucky as anyone, but if I put it, then I’ve read it to the end)). I did not think that it would be by classification, and I do not even think to strain my brain with this)). But to laugh always "for"!
Reply
My darling! Thanks enormously! Humor is our Fsyo! (c)
When the estimates correspond to the number of commenting, it also warms the soul.
By the way, if it were a story, not an article, I’m sure he wouldn’t have gone higher
Fortunately, the articles do not participate in the competition, and they are read, as I see it, mostly by my well-known authors. And new friends.
Reply
why then I have less categories
1. Unsatisfied others ... ry
2. Patients satisfied with themselves
I was very surprised by the wretched level of fantasy and simply understanding the process
Examples:
1. I published an unprocessed report of a woman to her husband, a kukolda. Did not edit, thought authenticity anyone interested
However, everyone thinks that I am the author. Yes, there is a mile away like a woman
2. Questions of type, and why they use preziki if they are at that age?
Damn, and how to protect against infection? People unfamiliar, who knows?
Well, few reviews on the case. Immediately become personal. Yes, you go to the zoophiles, dear Belinsky and explain to them what is immoral and what is not
If not in the subject, why judge
Reply
I do not quite understand what you mean? Quite a messy presentation. And how does it relate to my article?
Reply
I said that for some reason I have critics of only 2 categories
and I listed them
Then I complained to them (critics). Gave 2 examples
Reply
I looked with one eye. Only 2 stories, and I have 80. When there will be at least a dozen - there will be others))))
Reply
Bravo!!!
I recognized myself at the same time in Goblin zasrachenskom, umnyachivuse and bouncing :)
Ay well done!
Reply
Wow! For the first time I hear from Smol praise. Thank! By the way, the continuation is written at your request)))
Reply
10 for the truth !!! Did you happen to write articles on Lukmore? Very style similar to the local authors)
Reply
Thanks Roxy! No, but sometimes I read some articles there)))
Reply
+10! :)))
I feel that I have to create a tablet with types and put a plus sign next to the features that are inherent in every type :) And then the method of greatest determination is :)))))))))))))))))))))
Reply
Mark come on! Here many have already decided and confessed. I am among them)))))))
Reply
I jumped like))
funny))
Reply
You are still young, green. Here in a year be defined)))
Everybody starts like that. And then they write thoughtfully and in length ...
Reply
you know, I haven’t gotten to the odds, I never thought that comments are so important for authors.
Reply
Some authors are not shy and write under the story that they are not important assessment. And kamenty are important. Whatever. I sometimes do that. It is very important to me. But let honest, not goblin. After all, any author is pleased when they point out his mistakes. Nice and when praise. It is unpleasant when they write: “I did not read it, but I condemn it” or something else that is not related to the work.
Fore nothing to do with. Opening your soul, you want to do not spit there, and wrote what they think about it. Each story of a real author is a peeling off of live skin. If he is at least a bit autobiographical.
When you write a story about yourself, even changing the names, place and time - this means that you have opened your veins and each letter is written with your blood. Like this...
Reply
I followed the link from the comment in another story and have no regrets. The author has an excellent sense of humor, observation and a sharp mind. I will read his stories to raise the mood.
Reply
Thank you Executor! Yes, I try to write mostly with humor.)))
Reply
A new class has been opened: PR critic :)
Reply
Sinner. Need to remember. Thank))
Reply
But I, too, came from a link from another story. Thank you, enslave.
Reply
Snack, and I thank for reviving my long-forgotten work))
Reply