/ The authors / angry_osh / Comments

Comment on publication: New house. Part 2

Keyword: CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM. I asked to point out the pros and cons, you saw only cons, this can not be in principle. You probably did not read my answer well, for me the grammar is not so important, for me the main immersion in the story is just my fantasy with which I shared. If you can't read a story where there are mistakes, don't do it better. And if you wanted to help me as you wrote, your review would be in detail and “constructively” composed of pros and cons.

• Rating: -1

Comment on publication: New house. Part 2

In short, dude, in Russian at school I had 3 and for me the main thing is not grammar, but to convey the plot and the feeling of atmosphericity and immersion in the story. In the first part, the only negative feedback was from you, so the problem is not in the story but rather in you, because it seemed to me that people liked it. Secondly, I don’t know why you so decided that the girls don’t like it, but I was trying to do something like phone sex on these topics. Just such fantasies really give birth to a partner, no one says that in real life I would have started to carry myself like that. Further I read your comments, almost in every your comment there is a word “cardboard” and “linear character”, and you tell me something else about primitiveness and linearity. You are funny. I have a big request to you, do not read my stories anymore. Think with your head before writing a comment, treat such creativity as a fantasy and not a real life experience. (And yes, I know that I wrote illiterately now and the phrases were built incorrectly)

• Rating: -2